Fifteen years ago, when the first wave of business reengineering books called for a top-to-bottom rethink of every aspect of business, communication consistently showed up as an afterthought. Hammer and Champy’s Reengineering the Corporation, the top change-management reference of its day, devoted barely a paragraph to leadership communication. This was a stunning omission, when you think about it, since strategic communication is essential for making anything happen.
Let’s first nail down what we mean by strategic communication: clear, specific messages delivered at specific times and places, to generate specific actions among specific constituencies, to create momentum in a specific direction.
Even today, strategic communication is largely ignored or left to chance in organizational transformation projects and large-scale business initiatives. When it is addressed, strategic communication usually shows up as a calendar of data dumps, lengthy employee surveys, or “town hall” Q&A sessions where managers gamely try to have all the answers.
There are two main reasons for this. First is the astonishingly persistent fantasy that leadership communication just happens as a natural consequence of strategic planning, that all it takes is a reminder to leaders to “communicate, communicate, communicate” and all will be well.
Second, even where leaders clearly understand their role as communicators for action, very few understand what to say and how to say it. So managers tend to default either to bullying or scaring employees into action, or else shower their people with information in the hope that some good will come of it. Both approaches are time-honored and perhaps even logical, but they inevitably fail to get genuine buy-in from the rank and file.
So, what do successful leaders say and do that inspires people to extraordinary performance? Can it be learned? Can it be taught? Can anybody do it, or only a gifted few?
Working with business leaders around the world, we’ve confirmed that virtually everyone has the capacity to move, touch, and inspire others to action for the common good. What’s missing in most managers is a genuine personal commitment to a vision, a willingness to declare that commitment publicly, and a real interest in and connection with those they lead.
“Inspirational” or “charismatic” business leaders tend to show remarkable consistency in three areas:
1. They know exactly where they’re going. They have a clear and compelling vision.
2. They passionately believe what they’re saying and obviously have “skin
in the game.”
3. They genuinely connect with the needs and interests of the people they are speaking to; it’s not phony.
Along the way, these leaders show other characteristics that make them stand out:
- They are not afraid to say “I don’t know” and trust that “the answers are in the room.”
- Their language consistently emphasizes possibility over need, and can over must.
- Instead of inundating people with information, these leaders typically use very few slides, and say only what’s necessary to generate the desired result.
- They make clear, specific action requests that leave no doubt as to next steps.
- And they intentionally bring up tough questions and issues, and expect others to do the same.
So what does this have to do with strategic communication? Plenty, because no matter how well conceived a business plan may be and how beautifully crafted the message, nobody is likely to come out of the stands and play for keeps unless he or she believes a leader is worth following.
Think of it this way: In a typical workplace, each of us willingly puts forth what we might call obligatory or “got to” effort. This includes the 8 or 10 hours we’re expected to spend at work, a certain attention to detail, reasonable attention to safety, and a willingness to pitch in and help. This effort is obligatory in the sense that we feel we owe it to our colleagues and the business in exchange for the money we’re paid.
But difficult, large-scale change such as organizational transformation requires more than obligatory effort. Every recent model for managing change stresses the importance of positive engagement and enthusiastic participation from everyone in the organization. We call this discretionary, or “want to” effort. Discretionary effort includes the ideas, extra time, commitment, and enthusiastic engagement that can’t be coerced, but can only be given freely.
Say, for example, that it occurs to a maintenance operator that her unit could save tens of thousands of dollars by using off-the-shelf tractor batteries instead of expensive, imported Swedish batteries that came with the equipment. (A real example, by the way.) Nothing can force her to share that idea with a supervisor or a team. She won’t be paid more if she does, or less if she doesn’t. The only thing that will cause her to come forward with this idea, this discretionary effort, is her desire to do so. And communication from leadership has a profound influence on that desire.
While we believe all good managers have at least the capacity to inspire others to outstanding performance, we also recognize that most have a hard time telling the difference between their communication strengths and weaknesses. Advanced Leadership Communication courses provide a laboratory for leaders to identify, demonstrate, and be acknowledged for their authentic communication strengths, and to drop habits that may be hindering employee engagement and business performance.
Authentic leadership communication can’t be faked. If a manager only pretends to care about employees, or only pretends to believe in the senior team’s vision, his constituents will know.
It’s not about being slick, or commanding, or having the perfect message. It’s about being real. For any leader who wants to engage the hearts and minds of the organization, the place to start is by looking in the mirror. |